Re: [RFC PATCH v5 00/29] TDX KVM selftests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 00/29] TDX KVM selftests
From: Sagi Shahar <sagis@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 15:52:57 -0500
Cc: "Zhao, Yan Y" <yan.y.zhao@xxxxxxxxx>, "Aktas, Erdem" <erdemaktas@xxxxxxxxxx>, "vipinsh@xxxxxxxxxx" <vipinsh@xxxxxxxxxx>, "shuah@xxxxxxxxxx" <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Xu, Haibo1" <haibo1.xu@xxxxxxxxx>, "kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Afranji, Ryan" <afranji@xxxxxxxxxx>, "dmatlack@xxxxxxxxxx" <dmatlack@xxxxxxxxxx>, "seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx" <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>, "pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx" <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx" <linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx>, "Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx>, "ackerleytng@xxxxxxxxxx" <ackerleytng@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx" <jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Annapurve, Vishal" <vannapurve@xxxxxxxxxx>, "runanwang@xxxxxxxxxx" <runanwang@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "chao.p.peng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <chao.p.peng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "pgonda@xxxxxxxxxx" <pgonda@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <271e9f4168175f36f90c91fbe45e6e628e157ca2.camel@intel.com>
References: <20231212204647.2170650-1-sagis@google.com> <ce967287157e830303fdd3d4a37e7d62a1698747.camel@intel.com> <CAAhR5DFmT0n9KWRMtO=FkWbm9_tXy1gP-mpbyF05mmLUph2dPA@mail.gmail.com> <59652393edbf94a8ac7bf8d069d15ecb826867e1.camel@intel.com> <7c3abac8c28310916651a25c30277fc1efbad56f.camel@intel.com> <CAAhR5DH79H2+riwtu_+cw-OpdRm02ELdbVt6T_5TQG3t4qAs2Q@mail.gmail.com> <e161c300e9c91237c5585fab084101a8f46768e2.camel@intel.com> <CAAhR5DF=wAVsshyX-JqcPhhrVp8rEF11uJkB-OSEUM-B-oEZoQ@mail.gmail.com> <262ee73f23445fea7129a784ff3d6bc4294c25c0.camel@intel.com> <271e9f4168175f36f90c91fbe45e6e628e157ca2.camel@intel.com>

On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 9:51 PM Edgecombe, Rick P
<rick.p.edgecombe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> +Yan
>
> On Wed, 2024-06-05 at 14:44 -0700, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
> > > I will take a look at rebasing the selftests on top of the Intel
> > > development branch and I can post it on our github branch. We can talk
> > > about co-development offline. We already have some code that was
> > > suggested by Isaku as part of our tests.
> >
> > That would be great, thanks.
>
> Hi,
>
> Any update on this rebase?

I finished rebasing the basic life cycle test and found a bug in
tdx_gmem_post_populate which took me some time to debug and fix.
I'm going to start a separate thread to share and discuss the selftests.

>
> Thanks,
>
> Rick

References:
- [RFC PATCH v5 00/29] TDX KVM selftests
  - From: Sagi Shahar
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 00/29] TDX KVM selftests
  - From: Verma, Vishal L
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 00/29] TDX KVM selftests
  - From: Sagi Shahar
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 00/29] TDX KVM selftests
  - From: Verma, Vishal L
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 00/29] TDX KVM selftests
  - From: Verma, Vishal L
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 00/29] TDX KVM selftests
  - From: Sagi Shahar
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 00/29] TDX KVM selftests
  - From: Edgecombe, Rick P
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 00/29] TDX KVM selftests
  - From: Sagi Shahar
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 00/29] TDX KVM selftests
  - From: Edgecombe, Rick P
- Re: [RFC PATCH v5 00/29] TDX KVM selftests
  - From: Edgecombe, Rick P

Prev by Date: [PATCH v2 0/2] exec: Avoid pathological argc, envc, and bprm->p values
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 6/7] mm/x86: Add missing pud helpers
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 00/29] TDX KVM selftests
Next by thread: vmscan.c:(.text+0x40d2): relocation truncated to fit: R_CKCORE_PCREL_IMM16BY4 against `__jump_table'
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]