On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 10:03 PM Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 05:05:43PM +0000, Jiaqi Yan wrote:
> > - * Returns 0 on success
> > - * -EOPNOTSUPP for hwpoison_filter() filtered the error event
> > + * Returns 0 on success,
> > + * -EOPNOTSUPP for hwpoison_filter() filtered the error event,
> > + * -EOPNOTSUPP if disabled by /proc/sys/vm/enable_soft_offline,
> > * < 0 otherwise negated errno.
> > *
> > * Soft offline a page, by migration or invalidation,
> > @@ -2783,6 +2795,12 @@ int soft_offline_page(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
> > return -EIO;
> > }
> >
> > + if (!sysctl_enable_soft_offline) {
> > + pr_info("%#lx: OS-wide disabled\n", pfn);
> > + put_ref_page(pfn, flags);
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > + }
>
> We should not be doing anything if soft_offline is disabled, so this check should
> be placed upfront, at the very beginning of the function.
> Then you can remove the 'put_ref_page' call.
I think if MF_COUNT_INCREASED is in flags, we still need to
put_ref_page(), right?
>
>
> --
> Oscar Salvador
> SUSE Labs
