Re: [PATCH v10 0/5] Introduce mseal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 23 May 2024 at 16:54, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The testing and implementation review seem OK.  But from a higher-level
> perspective Linus doesn't seem to be on board(?).

Oh, I'm fine with mseal.

I wasn't fine with the insane "m*() system calls should be atomic"
discussion where Theo was just making shit up. I honestly don't think
mseal() needs it either.

               Linus




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux