On Thu, 23 May 2024 16:32:26 -0700 Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 12:52:13PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 10:46:46AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 16:35:19 +0000 jeffxu@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > > > This patchset proposes a new mseal() syscall for the Linux kernel. > > > > > > I have not moved this into mm-stable for a 6.10 merge. Mainly because > > > of the total lack of Reviewed-by:s and Acked-by:s. > > > > Oh, I thought I had already reviewed it. FWIW, please consider it: > > > > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > The code appears to be stable enough for a merge. > > > > Agreed. > > > > > It's awkward that we're in conference this week, but I ask people to > > > give consideration to the desirability of moving mseal() into mainline > > > sometime over the next week, please. > > > > Yes please. :) > > Is the plan still to land this for 6.10? With the testing it's had in > -next and Liam's review, I think we're good to go? The testing and implementation review seem OK. But from a higher-level perspective Linus doesn't seem to be on board(?). I was planning on holding onto this, see if the discussion progresses across this -rc cycle.
