Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] CXL Development Discussions

[Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 12 May 2024, Michal Hocko wrote:

> > +1. I think the performance implications of CXL memory and how it relates
> > to existing memory management code tackling performance differentiated memory
> > would be nice to separate. I think Davidlohr would be a great candidate to
> > lead this discussion.
>
> WDYT Davidlohr?

I think that the relevant performance discussions will happen in the tiering
session from David R.

Thanks,
Davidlohr