Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] f2fs: drop usage of page_index

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2024/4/24 6:58, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 01:03:34AM +0800, Kairui Song wrote:
@@ -4086,8 +4086,7 @@ void f2fs_clear_page_cache_dirty_tag(struct page *page)
  	unsigned long flags;
xa_lock_irqsave(&mapping->i_pages, flags);
-	__xa_clear_mark(&mapping->i_pages, page_index(page),
-						PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY);
+	__xa_clear_mark(&mapping->i_pages, page->index, PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY);
  	xa_unlock_irqrestore(&mapping->i_pages, flags);
  }

I just sent a patch which is going to conflict with this:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20240423225552.4113447-3-willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Chao Yu, Jaegeuk Kim; what are your plans for converting f2fs to use

Hi Matthew,

I've converted .read_folio and .readahead of f2fs to use folio w/ below patchset,
and let me take a look how to support and enable large folio...

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/20240422062417.2421616-1-chao@xxxxxxxxxx/

Thanks,

folios?  This is getting quite urgent.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux