On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 10:47:12AM -0700, Vishal Moola wrote:
> -static vm_fault_t hugetlb_wp(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> - struct folio *pagecache_folio,
> +static vm_fault_t hugetlb_wp(struct folio *pagecache_folio,
> struct vm_fault *vmf)
> {
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
> + struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
I think 'vmf' should be the first parameter, not the second.
Compare:
static vm_fault_t do_page_mkwrite(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct folio *folio)
static inline void wp_page_reuse(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct folio *folio)
static vm_fault_t finish_mkwrite_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct folio *folio)
static vm_fault_t wp_page_shared(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct folio *folio)
vm_fault_t do_set_pmd(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct page *page)
void set_pte_range(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct folio *folio,
struct page *page, unsigned int nr, unsigned long addr)
int numa_migrate_prep(struct folio *folio, struct vm_fault *vmf,
unsigned long addr, int page_nid, int *flags)
static void numa_rebuild_single_mapping(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned long fault_addr, pte_t *fault_pte,
bool writable)
static void numa_rebuild_large_mapping(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
struct folio *folio, pte_t fault_pte,
bool ignore_writable, bool pte_write_upgrade)
static vm_fault_t wp_huge_pud(struct vm_fault *vmf, pud_t orig_pud)
numa_migrate_prep() is the only one which doesn't have vmf as the first
param. It's a subtle inconsistency, but one you notice after a while
... then wish you'd done right the first time, but can't quite bring
yourself to submit a patch to fix ;-)
