On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 02:58:29PM +0800, Nai Xia wrote: > OK, I think I'd stop discussing this topic now. Without strict and comprehensive > research on this topic, further arguments seems to me to be purely based on > imagination. I suggest to consider how ptep_clear_and_test_young works on the pte_young bit on the VM swapping code. Then apply your "concern" to the pte_young bit scan. If you can't NAK the swapping code in the kernel, well I guess you can't nack AutoNUMA as well because of that specific concern. And no I'm not saying this is trivial or obvious, I appreciate your thoughts a lot, just I'm quite convinced this is a subtle detail but an irrelevant one that gets lost in the noise. > If you insist on ignoring any constructive suggestions from others, > it's pretty much ok to do so. But I (and possibly many others who are > watching) > am pretty much possible to do a LOL to your development style. Well if you think answering your emails means ignoring your suggestions, be my guest. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>