Re: [PATCH 13/40] autonuma: CPU follow memory algorithm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 14:55 +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> +#ifdef __ia64__
> +#error "NOTE: tlb_migrate_finish won't run here"
> +#endif 

https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/29/359

Its an optional thing, not running it isn't fatal at all.

Also, ia64 has CONFIG_NUMA so all this code had better run on it.

That said, I've also already told you to stop using such forceful
migration, that simply doesn't make any sense, numa balancing isn't that
critical.

Unless you're going to listen to feedback I give you, I'm going to
completely stop reading your patches, I don't give a rats arse you work
for the same company anymore.

You're impossible to work with.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]