On 08.03.24 10:07, Barry Song wrote:
On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 10:03 PM David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 08.03.24 09:56, Barry Song wrote:
From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@xxxxxxxx>
In a Copy-on-Write (CoW) scenario, the last subpage will reuse the entire
large folio, resulting in the waste of (nr_pages - 1) pages. This wasted
memory remains allocated until it is either unmapped or memory
reclamation occurs.
The following small program can serve as evidence of this behavior
main()
{
#define SIZE 1024 * 1024 * 1024UL
void *p = malloc(SIZE);
memset(p, 0x11, SIZE);
if (fork() == 0)
_exit(0);
memset(p, 0x12, SIZE);
printf("done\n");
while(1);
}
For example, using a 1024KiB mTHP by:
echo always > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/hugepages-1024kB/enabled
(1) w/o the patch, it takes 2GiB,
Before running the test program,
/ # free -m
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 5754 84 5692 0 17 5669
Swap: 0 0 0
/ # /a.out &
/ # done
After running the test program,
/ # free -m
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 5754 2149 3627 0 19 3605
Swap: 0 0 0
(2) w/ the patch, it takes 1GiB only,
Before running the test program,
/ # free -m
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 5754 89 5687 0 17 5664
Swap: 0 0 0
/ # /a.out &
/ # done
After running the test program,
/ # free -m
total used free shared buff/cache available
Mem: 5754 1122 4655 0 17 4632
Swap: 0 0 0
This patch migrates the last subpage to a small folio and immediately
returns the large folio to the system. It benefits both memory availability
and anti-fragmentation.
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Lance Yang <ioworker0@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@xxxxxxxx>
---
mm/memory.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index e17669d4f72f..0200bfc15f94 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -3523,6 +3523,14 @@ static bool wp_can_reuse_anon_folio(struct folio *folio,
folio_unlock(folio);
return false;
}
+ /*
+ * If the last subpage reuses the entire large folio, it would
+ * result in a waste of (nr_pages - 1) pages
+ */
+ if (folio_ref_count(folio) == 1 && folio_test_large(folio)) {
+ folio_unlock(folio);
+ return false;
+ }
/*
* Ok, we've got the only folio reference from our mapping
* and the folio is locked, it's dark out, and we're wearing
Why not simply:
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index e17669d4f72f7..46d286bd450c6 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -3498,6 +3498,10 @@ static vm_fault_t wp_page_shared(struct vm_fault
*vmf, struct folio *folio)
static bool wp_can_reuse_anon_folio(struct folio *folio,
struct vm_area_struct *vma)
{
+
+ if (folio_test_large(folio))
+ return false;
+
/*
* We have to verify under folio lock: these early checks are
* just an optimization to avoid locking the folio and freeing
We could only possibly succeed if we are the last one mapping a PTE
either way. No we simply give up right away for the time being.
nice !
... of course, adding a comment like
"We could currently only reuse a subpage of a large folio if no other
subpages of the large folios are still mapped. However, let's just
consistently not reuse subpages even if we could reuse in that scenario,
and give back a large folio a bit sooner."
The !fotk() case would be more tricky to handle, because the folio has
PAE set and may be pinned or we might race with pinning. So this here is
the low hanging fruit.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
