Re: [PATCH] mm: prohibit the last subpage from reusing the entire large folio

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08.03.24 09:56, Barry Song wrote:
From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@xxxxxxxx>

In a Copy-on-Write (CoW) scenario, the last subpage will reuse the entire
large folio, resulting in the waste of (nr_pages - 1) pages. This wasted
memory remains allocated until it is either unmapped or memory
reclamation occurs.

The following small program can serve as evidence of this behavior

  main()
  {
  #define SIZE 1024 * 1024 * 1024UL
          void *p = malloc(SIZE);
          memset(p, 0x11, SIZE);
          if (fork() == 0)
                  _exit(0);
          memset(p, 0x12, SIZE);
          printf("done\n");
          while(1);
  }

For example, using a 1024KiB mTHP by:
  echo always > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/hugepages-1024kB/enabled

(1) w/o the patch, it takes 2GiB,

Before running the test program,
  / # free -m
                 total        used        free      shared  buff/cache   available
  Mem:            5754          84        5692           0          17        5669
  Swap:              0           0           0

  / # /a.out &
  / # done

After running the test program,
  / # free -m
                  total        used        free      shared  buff/cache   available
  Mem:            5754        2149        3627           0          19        3605
  Swap:              0           0           0

(2) w/ the patch, it takes 1GiB only,

Before running the test program,
  / # free -m
                  total        used        free      shared  buff/cache   available
  Mem:            5754          89        5687           0          17        5664
  Swap:              0           0           0

  / # /a.out &
  / # done

After running the test program,
  / # free -m
                 total        used        free      shared  buff/cache   available
  Mem:            5754        1122        4655           0          17        4632
  Swap:              0           0           0

This patch migrates the last subpage to a small folio and immediately
returns the large folio to the system. It benefits both memory availability
and anti-fragmentation.

Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Lance Yang <ioworker0@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@xxxxxxxx>
---
  mm/memory.c | 8 ++++++++
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index e17669d4f72f..0200bfc15f94 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -3523,6 +3523,14 @@ static bool wp_can_reuse_anon_folio(struct folio *folio,
  		folio_unlock(folio);
  		return false;
  	}
+	/*
+	 * If the last subpage reuses the entire large folio, it would
+	 * result in a waste of (nr_pages - 1) pages
+	 */
+	if (folio_ref_count(folio) == 1 && folio_test_large(folio)) {
+		folio_unlock(folio);
+		return false;
+	}
  	/*
  	 * Ok, we've got the only folio reference from our mapping
  	 * and the folio is locked, it's dark out, and we're wearing


Why not simply:

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index e17669d4f72f7..46d286bd450c6 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -3498,6 +3498,10 @@ static vm_fault_t wp_page_shared(struct vm_fault *vmf, struct folio *folio)
 static bool wp_can_reuse_anon_folio(struct folio *folio,
                                    struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 {
+
+       if (folio_test_large(folio))
+               return false;
+
        /*
         * We have to verify under folio lock: these early checks are
         * just an optimization to avoid locking the folio and freeing

We could only possibly succeed if we are the last one mapping a PTE either way. No we simply give up right away for the time being.

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux