Re: [PATCH 13/40] autonuma: CPU follow memory algorithm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 12:51 -0400, Dor Laor wrote:
>> Some developers have a thick skin and nothing gets in, others are human
>> and have feelings. Using a tiny difference in behavior we can do much
>> much better. What's works in a f2f loud discussion doesn't play well in
>> email.
>
> We're all humans, we all have feelings, and I'm frigging upset.
>
> As a maintainer I try and do my best to support and maintain the
> subsystems I'm responsible for. I take this very serious.

So, would you please very seriously look into my NAK ?
It's looks very clear to me.

>
> I don't agree with the approach Andrea takes, we all know that, yet I do
> want to talk about it. The problem is, many of the crucial details are
> non-obvious and no sane explanation seems forthcoming.
>
> I really feel I'm talking to deaf ears.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a hrefmailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]