Re: [RFC] Memory tiering kernel alignment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 25 Jan 2024, Matthew Wilcox wrote:

We should reject this technology before it harms our kernel and the
entire industry.  There's a reason that SGI died.  Nobody wants to buy
single image machines the size of a data centre.

Some people with big pockets needed these data center sized single image machines. SGI died because Intel was not able to support large memory (petabytes!) anymore after they neglected to develop the processor that they promised contractually to SGI and therefore the tech became unusuable for the deep pocketed customers.

The Linux kernel worked just fine with petabyte sized address spaces.

There are certainly use cases for large memory pools. They can be created and have been improvised using RDMA. Basically shifting memory back and forth into the small memory processor spaces that Intel confined us in by taking sections of a simulated petabyte sized cross machine "address space" that is spread over lots of network nodes.

CXL could perhaps allow us to come up with a better solution.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux