On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 4:13 AM Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Probably a bit too late, but should we also merge the zpool entry with > > > the zswap entry? I can send a follow up if we are in agreement. > > > > > > I am afraid we are not. That would be one more step in the wrong direction. > > Do you mind elaborating the reason? Zpool is only to abstract the > zswap allocators, it makes sense that it is tightly coupled with > zswap, no? Hmm, I must admit I misread your sentence. Sorry about that. Please disregard my previous comment, merging zpool with zswap sounds good to me. ~Vitaly
