On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 at 10:19, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 10:12:21AM +0100, Marco Elver wrote: > > On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 at 02:24, Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 11:15:05PM +0100, Marco Elver wrote: > > > > + /* > > > > + * Stack traces of size 0 are never saved, and we can simply use > > > > + * the size field as an indicator if this is a new unused stack > > > > + * record in the freelist. > > > > + */ > > > > + stack->size = 0; > > > > > > I would use WRITE_ONCE here too, at least for TSan. > > > > This is written with the pool_lock held. > > ...which doesn't help because the readers don't take it? This function is only refilling the freelist. Readers don't see it yet because it's in none of the hash table buckets. The freelist is only ever accessed under the lock. Once an entry is allocated from the freelist, its size is overwritten with something non-zero (since it then contains a stack trace). Those updates are released into the right hash table bucket with list_add_rcu() (which implies a release). Am I missing something else?
