Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/5] mm, security, bpf: Fine-grained control over memory policy adjustments with lsm bpf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/5] mm, security, bpf: Fine-grained control over memory policy adjustments with lsm bpf
From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 23:56:16 +0800
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, wad@xxxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jmorris@xxxxxxxxx, serge@xxxxxxxxxx, omosnace@xxxxxxxxxx, casey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx, mhocko@xxxxxxxx, ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, linux-security-module@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ligang.bdlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAHC9VhREmXPg2TgDcK+moeJv3AvDR1wKiKNEex0AX6cQAzhVjg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20231214125033.4158-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com> <CAHC9VhTs_5-SFq2M+w4SE7gMd3cHXP2P3y71O4H_q7XGUtvVUg@mail.gmail.com> <CALOAHbDEoZ_gPNg-ABE0-Qc0uPqwHJBLRpqSjFd7fH6r+oH23A@mail.gmail.com> <CAHC9VhQkRPMO2Xpg0gYdpOPZTDrp1xKwU=idt9EQJg7Zi7XjqQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALOAHbA-aW5gHXuf4MZVDXqD89Ri=9Ff7wcnV5wnBe=+pjkLrQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALOAHbCqMZE2F9E+KdLtF=hw9_hEkhjAsHaCHaRwKYWU3wyDyA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHC9VhREmXPg2TgDcK+moeJv3AvDR1wKiKNEex0AX6cQAzhVjg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 10:28 PM Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 1:07 AM Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Paul,
> >
> > Do you have any additional comments or further suggestions?
>
> No, I'm still comfortable with my original comments and stand by them.

I understand your perspective, but it seems I have to propose an
eBPF-based seccomp in the next step.

-- 
Regards
Yafang

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/5] mm, security, bpf: Fine-grained control over memory policy adjustments with lsm bpf
  - From: Paul Moore

References:
- [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/5] mm, security, bpf: Fine-grained control over memory policy adjustments with lsm bpf
  - From: Yafang Shao
- Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/5] mm, security, bpf: Fine-grained control over memory policy adjustments with lsm bpf
  - From: Paul Moore
- Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/5] mm, security, bpf: Fine-grained control over memory policy adjustments with lsm bpf
  - From: Yafang Shao
- Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/5] mm, security, bpf: Fine-grained control over memory policy adjustments with lsm bpf
  - From: Paul Moore
- Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/5] mm, security, bpf: Fine-grained control over memory policy adjustments with lsm bpf
  - From: Yafang Shao
- Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/5] mm, security, bpf: Fine-grained control over memory policy adjustments with lsm bpf
  - From: Yafang Shao
- Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/5] mm, security, bpf: Fine-grained control over memory policy adjustments with lsm bpf
  - From: Paul Moore

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add Yosry Ahmed as a zswap reviewer
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add Yosry Ahmed as a zswap reviewer
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/5] mm, security, bpf: Fine-grained control over memory policy adjustments with lsm bpf
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/5] mm, security, bpf: Fine-grained control over memory policy adjustments with lsm bpf
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux Omap] [Fedora ARM] [IETF Annouce] [Bugtraq] [Linux OMAP] [Linux MIPS] [eCos] [Asterisk Internet PBX] [Linux API]