On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 09:27:38 -0800 Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 2:00 AM kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master > > head: bc63de6e6ba0b16652c5fb4b9c9916b9e7ca1f23 > > commit: d02321ca0329457d5828a83b82b156e6337c4236 [5469/6165] selftests/mm: add UFFDIO_MOVE ioctl test > > compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231208/202312081716.LUUhSNS4-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce) > > > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> > > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312081716.LUUhSNS4-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/ > > > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > Huh. This is strange. I checked linux-next.git and looks like the > patch adding the test [1] is there but the one actually adding new > ioctl [2] is missing (at least I do not see the new definitions in > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/include/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h). > Patches belong to the same series. I'll check what's going on later > today. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231206103702.3873743-6-surenb@xxxxxxxxxx/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231206103702.3873743-3-surenb@xxxxxxxxxx/ Thanks. Seems I messed up some reject resolution.. Fixed now.
