On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 10:05 AM Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 09:27:38 -0800 Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 8, 2023 at 2:00 AM kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
> > head: bc63de6e6ba0b16652c5fb4b9c9916b9e7ca1f23
> > commit: d02321ca0329457d5828a83b82b156e6337c4236 [5469/6165] selftests/mm: add UFFDIO_MOVE ioctl test
> > compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
> > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231208/202312081716.LUUhSNS4-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce)
> >
> > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
> > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312081716.LUUhSNS4-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> Huh. This is strange. I checked linux-next.git and looks like the
> patch adding the test [1] is there but the one actually adding new
> ioctl [2] is missing (at least I do not see the new definitions in
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/include/uapi/linux/userfaultfd.h).
> Patches belong to the same series. I'll check what's going on later
> today.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231206103702.3873743-6-surenb@xxxxxxxxxx/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231206103702.3873743-3-surenb@xxxxxxxxxx/
Thanks. Seems I messed up some reject resolution.. Fixed now.
Great! Let me verify mm-unstable. Thanks!
