Re: [PATCH v2 06/19] lib/stackdepot: fix and clean-up atomic annotations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 7:15 PM <andrey.konovalov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Simplify comments accompanying the use of atomic accesses in the
> stack depot code.
>
> Also drop smp_load_acquire from next_pool_required in depot_init_pool,
> as both depot_init_pool and the all smp_store_release's to this variable
> are executed under the stack depot lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@xxxxxxxxxx>

(but see below)


>                  * Move on to the next pool.
>                  * WRITE_ONCE pairs with potential concurrent read in
> -                * stack_depot_fetch().
> +                * stack_depot_fetch.

Why are you removing the parentheses here? kernel-doc uses them to
tell functions from non-functions, and having them in non-doc comments
sounds consistent.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux