Re: [PATCH 1/5] locking: Add rwsem_is_write_locked()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 08:27:15AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:

> I could live with Longman's suggestion of an rwsem_assert_is_locked that
> only exists if DEBUG_RWSEMS is enabled.  Something like:
> 
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RWSEMS
> static inline bool __rwsem_assert_is_locked(struct rw_semaphore *rwsem,
> 		const char *file, int line)
> {
> 	bool ret = rwsem_is_locked(rwsem);
> 	if (!ret)
> 		WARN(1, "!rwsem_is_locked(rwsem) at %s line %d", file, line);
> 	return ret;
> }
> #define rwsem_assert_is_locked(r) \
> 	__rwsem_assert_is_locked((r), __FILE__, __LINE__)
> #endif
> 
> and then XFS could do:
> 
> 	ASSERT(rwsem_assert_is_locked(&VFS_I(ip)->i_rwsem));
> 
> Wherein ASSERT is only #defined if CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG, and XFS_DEBUG
> selects DEBUG_RWSEMS, per Longman's suggestion.  That's work for what we
> want it for (simple cheap lock checking) without becoming a general
> lockabuse predicate.

Ack.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux