Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] memfd: improve userspace warnings for missing exec-related flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 1 Sep 2023 07:13:45 +0200 Damian Tometzki <dtometzki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> >  	if (!(flags & (MFD_EXEC | MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL))) {
> > -		pr_warn_once(
> > +		pr_info_ratelimited(
> >  			"%s[%d]: memfd_create() called without MFD_EXEC or MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL set\n",
> >  			current->comm, task_pid_nr(current));
> >  	}
> > 
> > -- 
> > 2.41.0
> >
> Hello Sarai,
> 
> i got a lot of messages in dmesg with this. DMESG is unuseable with
> this. 
> [ 1390.349462] __do_sys_memfd_create: 5 callbacks suppressed
> [ 1390.349468] pipewire-pulse[2930]: memfd_create() called without MFD_EXEC or MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL set
> [ 1390.350106] pipewire[2712]: memfd_create() called without MFD_EXEC or MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL set

OK, thanks, I'll revert this.  Spamming everyone even harder isn't a
good way to get developers to fix their stuff.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux