On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:02 AM, <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> So, I think we should reconsider about shared mempolicy completely. > > Quite frankly, I'd prefer that approach. The code is subtle and > horribly bug-fraught, and I absolutely detest the way it looks too. > Reading your patches was actually somewhat painful. Oh, very sorry. I made effort to make smallest and simplest patches. But I couldn't I do better. Current MPOL_F_SHARED is cra^H^H^H complex. ;-) > If we could just remove the support for it entirely, that would be > *much* preferable to continue working with this code. > > Could we just try that removal, and see if anybody screams? I'm keeping neutral a while and hope to hear other developers opinion. Thank you. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href