Re: [PATCH 0/6] mempolicy memory corruption fixlet

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 2:02 AM,  <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> So, I think we should reconsider about shared mempolicy completely.

Quite frankly, I'd prefer that approach. The code is subtle and
horribly bug-fraught, and I absolutely detest the way it looks too.
Reading your patches was actually somewhat painful.

If we could just remove the support for it entirely, that would be
*much* preferable to continue working with this code.

Could we just try that removal, and see if anybody screams?

                  Linus

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]