On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 01:50:02PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Wed, 30 May 2012, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > I always regretted that cpusets were no done with custom node lists. > > That would have been much cleaner and also likely faster than what we have. > > Could shared memory policies ignore cpuset constraints? Only if noone uses cpusets as a "security" mechanism, just for a "soft policy" Even with soft policy you could well break someone's setup. Maybe there are some better ways to do that now with memcg, not fully sure. -Andi -- ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>