On Mon, Jul 31 2023 at 18:11, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21 2023 at 12:22, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> -#define FUTEX2_MASK (FUTEX2_32 | FUTEX2_PRIVATE)
>> +#define FUTEX2_MASK (FUTEX2_64 | FUTEX2_PRIVATE)
>>
>> /**
>> * futex_parse_waitv - Parse a waitv array from userspace
>> @@ -207,7 +207,12 @@ static int futex_parse_waitv(struct fute
>> if ((aux.flags & ~FUTEX2_MASK) || aux.__reserved)
>> return -EINVAL;
>
> With the above aux.flags with FUTEX2_32 set will result in -EINVAL. I
> don't think that's intentional.
Also if you allow 64bit wide futexes, how is that supposed to work with
the existing code, which clearly expects a 32bit uval throughout the
place?
Thanks,
tglx
