Re: [PATCH v1 02/14] futex: Extend the FUTEX2 flags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 21 2023 at 12:22, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> +#define FUTEX2_8		0x00
> +#define FUTEX2_16		0x01
>  #define FUTEX2_32		0x02
> -			/*	0x04 */
> +#define FUTEX2_64		0x03
> +#define FUTEX2_NUMA		0x04
>  			/*	0x08 */
>  			/*	0x10 */
>  			/*	0x20 */
> --- a/kernel/futex/syscalls.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex/syscalls.c
> @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(futex, u32 __user *, uad
>  	return do_futex(uaddr, op, val, tp, uaddr2, (unsigned long)utime, val3);
>  }
>  
> -#define FUTEX2_MASK (FUTEX2_32 | FUTEX2_PRIVATE)
> +#define FUTEX2_MASK (FUTEX2_64 | FUTEX2_PRIVATE)
>  
>  /**
>   * futex_parse_waitv - Parse a waitv array from userspace
> @@ -207,7 +207,12 @@ static int futex_parse_waitv(struct fute
>  		if ((aux.flags & ~FUTEX2_MASK) || aux.__reserved)
>  			return -EINVAL;

With the above aux.flags with FUTEX2_32 set will result in -EINVAL. I
don't think that's intentional.

Thanks,

        tglx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux