On Thu, 17 May 2012, Glauber Costa wrote: > > > > If for whatever reordering people may decide doing another state is > > > added, or > > > > this function is called later, that will fail > > Then the assumptions that SYSFS is the final state is no longer true and > > therefore the code needs to be inspected if this change affects anything. > > > yes, by humans, that are known to make mistakes. Using >= is a tiny attitude > that protects about failures in this realm. No it risks breakage because the code will run now under a condition when the system has not been brought up fully. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>