On 05/17/2012 06:16 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
That is only true if you add another state.
precisely.
> If for whatever reordering people may decide doing another state is added, or
> this function is called later, that will fail
Then the assumptions that SYSFS is the final state is no longer true and
therefore the code needs to be inspected if this change affects anything.
yes, by humans, that are known to make mistakes. Using >= is a tiny
attitude that protects about failures in this realm.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>