On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 at 13:44, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 17 Jun 2023 14:40:36 +1000 Liam Ni <zhiguangni01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > __nr_to_section() may return a null pointer,
> > before accessing the member variable section_mem_map,
> > we should first determine whether it is a null pointer.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > --- a/mm/sparse.c
> > +++ b/mm/sparse.c
> > @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static void __init memory_present(int nid, unsigned long start, unsigned long en
> > set_section_nid(section, nid);
> >
> > ms = __nr_to_section(section);
> > - if (!ms->section_mem_map) {
> > + if (ms && !ms->section_mem_map) {
> > ms->section_mem_map = sparse_encode_early_nid(nid) |
> > SECTION_IS_ONLINE;
> > __section_mark_present(ms, section);
>
> I'm suspecting that if __nr_to_section() returns NULL here, we should
> just panic. But a null-deref gives the same information, so why change
> things?
Do you mean if ms is a null pointer，ms->section_mem_map will cause
system panic,so we needn't change?
>
