Re: [LSF/MM/BPF] Whither Highmem?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 12:20:42AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> 
> I see there's a couple of spots on the schedule open, so here's something
> fun we could talk about.
> 
> Highmem was originally introduced to support PAE36 (up to 64GB) on x86
> in the late 90s.  It's since been used to support a similar extension
> on ARM (maybe other 32-bit architectures?)
> 
> Things have changed a bit since then.  There aren't a lot of systems
> left which have more than 4GB of memory _and_ are incapable of running a
> 64-bit kernel.

Actual limit is lower. With 3G/1G userspace/kernel split you will have
somewhere about 700Mb of virtual address space for direct mapping.

But, I would like to get rid of highmem too. Not sure how realistic it is.

-- 
  Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux