Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] The future of memory tiering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi David,

Thanks for proposing this topic. I'd like to join the discussion.

Some inline comments in the below.

On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 9:30 PM David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> As requested, sending along a last minute topic suggestion for
> consideration for LSF/MM/BPF 2023 :)
>
> For a sizable set of emerging technologies, memory tiering presents one of
> the most formidable challenges and exicting opportunities for the MM
> subsystem today.
>
> "Memory tiering" can mean many different things based on the user: from
> traditional every day NUMA, to swap (to zswap), to NVDIMMs, to HBM, to
> locally attached CXL memory, to memory borrowing over PCIe, to memory
> pooling with disaggregation, and beyond.
>
> Just as NUMA started out only being useful for the supercomputers, memory
> tiering will likely evolve over the next five years to take on an
> expanding set of use cases, and likely with rapidly increasing adoption
> even beyond hyperscalers.
>
> I think a discussion about memory tiering would be highly valuable.  A few
> key questions that I think can drive this discussion:
>
>  - What are the various form factors that must be supported as short-term
>    goals as well as need to be supported 5+ years into the future?
>
>  - What incremental changes need to be made on top of NUMA support to
>    fully support the wide range of use cases that will be coming?  (Is
>    memory tiering support built entirely upon NUMA?)

AFAICT, per the before discussion numa distance may be not enough to
rank the memory devices in tiers properly. We may need to figure out
one or multiple better metrics.

>
>  - What is the minimum viable *default* support that the MM subsystem
>    should provide for tiered configs?  What are the set of optimizations
>    that should be left to userspace or BPF to control?
>
>  - What are the various page promotion technqiues that we must plan for
>    beyond traditional NUMA balancing that will allow us to exploit
>    hardware innovation?
>
> (And I'm sure there are more topics of discussion that others would
> readily add.  It would be great to have additional ideas in replies.)
>
> A key challenge in all of this is to make memory tiering support in the
> upstream kernel compatible with the roadmaps of various CPU vendors.  A
> key goal is to ensure the end user benefits from all of this rapid
> innovation with generalized support that is well abstracted and allows for
> extensibility.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux