[PATCH] Fix some coding style errors in memblock.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This patch removes the initialization of some static variables to 0 and
`false` in the memblock source file, according to the coding style
guidelines.

Signed-off-by: Claudio Migliorelli <claudio.migliorelli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 mm/memblock.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 25fd0626a9e7..6f0a2eda427c 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -156,10 +156,10 @@ static __refdata struct memblock_type *memblock_memory = &memblock.memory;
 	} while (0)
 
 static int memblock_debug __initdata_memblock;
-static bool system_has_some_mirror __initdata_memblock = false;
+static bool system_has_some_mirror __initdata_memblock;
 static int memblock_can_resize __initdata_memblock;
-static int memblock_memory_in_slab __initdata_memblock = 0;
-static int memblock_reserved_in_slab __initdata_memblock = 0;
+static int memblock_memory_in_slab __initdata_memblock;
+static int memblock_reserved_in_slab __initdata_memblock;
 
 static enum memblock_flags __init_memblock choose_memblock_flags(void)
 {
-- 
2.38.4






[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux