Re: [PATCH 7/9] um: Should hold tasklist_lock while traversing processes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 23.04.2012 09:09, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
Traversing the tasks requires holding tasklist_lock, otherwise it
is unsafe.

p.s. However, I'm not sure that calling os_kill_ptraced_process()
in the atomic context is correct. It seem to work, but please
take a closer look.

Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov<anton.vorontsov@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

You forgot my Ack and I've already explained why os_kill_ptraced_process() is fine.

Thanks,
//richard

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]