Traversing the tasks requires holding tasklist_lock, otherwise it
is unsafe.
p.s. However, I'm not sure that calling os_kill_ptraced_process()
in the atomic context is correct. It seem to work, but please
take a closer look.
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/um/kernel/reboot.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/um/kernel/reboot.c b/arch/um/kernel/reboot.c
index 4d93dff..66d754c 100644
--- a/arch/um/kernel/reboot.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/reboot.c
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
*/
#include "linux/sched.h"
+#include "linux/spinlock.h"
#include "linux/slab.h"
#include "kern_util.h"
#include "os.h"
@@ -22,6 +23,7 @@ static void kill_off_processes(void)
struct task_struct *p;
int pid;
+ read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
for_each_process(p) {
if (p->mm == NULL)
continue;
@@ -29,6 +31,7 @@ static void kill_off_processes(void)
pid = p->mm->context.id.u.pid;
os_kill_ptraced_process(pid, 1);
}
+ read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
}
}
--
1.7.9.2
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>