On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 02:55:09PM -0800, Yosry Ahmed wrote: > This, of course, isn't free. There is an associated overhead. It's a > trade off like most things are. We want to work towards the outcome of > that tradeoff that makes sense, we don't want to incur too much > overhead, but we also don't want a very complicated and error-prone > implementation. I agree it is all about trade offs. I can't resist the chance to save memory :-) Chris
