Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Introduce memcg_stock_pcp remote draining

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri 03-02-23 11:25:16, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 04:21:09PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > OK, so this is a speculative patch. cpu_is_isolated doesn't exist yet. I
> > have talked to Frederic off-list and he is working on an implementation.
> > I will be offline next whole week (will be back Feb 13th) so I am
> > sending this early but this patch cannot be merged without his one of
> > course.
> > 
> > I have tried to summarize the reasoning behind both approach should we
> > ever need to revisit this approach. For now I strongly believe a simpler
> > solution should be preferred.
> > 
> > Roman, I have added your ack as you indicated but if you disagree with
> > the reasoning please let me know.
> 
> Great, thank you for preparing it up! Really nice summary.
> My ack definitely applies.
> 
> If you want, feel free to add a
> "Suggested-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@xxxxxxxxx>"
> tag to blame me later :)

Sure, I have updated the changelog. I will repost after the patchset by
Frederic[1] is merged.

[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230203232409.163847-1-frederic@xxxxxxxxxx
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux