On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 04:21:09PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > OK, so this is a speculative patch. cpu_is_isolated doesn't exist yet. I > have talked to Frederic off-list and he is working on an implementation. > I will be offline next whole week (will be back Feb 13th) so I am > sending this early but this patch cannot be merged without his one of > course. > > I have tried to summarize the reasoning behind both approach should we > ever need to revisit this approach. For now I strongly believe a simpler > solution should be preferred. > > Roman, I have added your ack as you indicated but if you disagree with > the reasoning please let me know. Great, thank you for preparing it up! Really nice summary. My ack definitely applies. If you want, feel free to add a "Suggested-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@xxxxxxxxx>" tag to blame me later :) Thank you!
