Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/6] selftests/vm: extend test_vmalloc to test execmem_* APIs

To: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/6] selftests/vm: extend test_vmalloc to test execmem_* APIs
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 21:22:14 +0100
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, rick.p.edgecombe@xxxxxxxxx, rppt@xxxxxxxxxx, mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAPhsuW6zOVjK5bvS_A=RNUAExeepSPrpE7xWOOAq6W5qJ3m=vA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20221128190245.2337461-1-song@kernel.org> <20221128190245.2337461-4-song@kernel.org> <20221129083518.GA25167@lst.de> <CAPhsuW6zOVjK5bvS_A=RNUAExeepSPrpE7xWOOAq6W5qJ3m=vA@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 09:31:24AM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
> I guess we can just drop 3/6 of the set, and everything else would just work.

Yes.

References:
- [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/6] execmem_alloc for BPF programs
  - From: Song Liu
- [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/6] selftests/vm: extend test_vmalloc to test execmem_* APIs
  - From: Song Liu
- Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/6] selftests/vm: extend test_vmalloc to test execmem_* APIs
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/6] selftests/vm: extend test_vmalloc to test execmem_* APIs
  - From: Song Liu