On 11/18/22 18:06, Kees Cook wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 12:34:01PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> On 11/18/22 04:51, Kees Cook wrote: >> > Passing a constant-0 size allocation into kmalloc() or kmalloc_node() >> > does not need to be a fast-path operation, so the static return value >> > can be removed entirely. This is in preparation for making sure that >> > all paths through the inlines result in a full extern function call, >> >> So with the kmalloc_trace() already solved, we could now say it's not "in >> preparation", but simply "makes sure", right? I can correct that while >> picking this patch. > > Yeah, good point. I missed this when updating the commit logs. Thanks! Great, pushed to slab/for-6.2/alloc_size
