On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 12:34:01PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 11/18/22 04:51, Kees Cook wrote: > > Passing a constant-0 size allocation into kmalloc() or kmalloc_node() > > does not need to be a fast-path operation, so the static return value > > can be removed entirely. This is in preparation for making sure that > > all paths through the inlines result in a full extern function call, > > So with the kmalloc_trace() already solved, we could now say it's not "in > preparation", but simply "makes sure", right? I can correct that while > picking this patch. Yeah, good point. I missed this when updating the commit logs. Thanks! -- Kees Cook
