On 03/22/2012 03:36 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:07:00 -0400, Larry Woodman said:
So to be clear on this, in that case the intention would be move 3 to 4,
4 to 5 and 5 to 6
to keep the node ordering the same?
Would it make more sense to do 5->6, 4->5, 3->4? If we move stuff
from 3 to 4 before clearing the old 4 stuff out, it might get crowded?
Yes, I didnt try to imply the order in which pages were moved just
the additional moving necessary.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>