On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote: > > So to be clear on this, in that case the intention would be move 3 to 4, > > 4 to 5 and 5 to 6 > > to keep the node ordering the same? > > Would it make more sense to do 5->6, 4->5, 3->4? If we move stuff > from 3 to 4 before clearing the old 4 stuff out, it might get crowded? Right. I thought Paul did take care of that way back when it was written? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>