On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 14:10:32 -0800 (PST) Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 18 Nov 2022, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 12:51:09 -0800 (PST) Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > But the first series has not yet graduated from mm-unstable, > > > so if Andrew and/or Kirill also prefer to have them combined into one > > > bit_spin_lock-less series, that I can do. (And the end result should be > > > identical, so would not complicate Johannes's lock_page_memcg() excision.) > > > > I'd prefer that approach. > > I think you're saying that you prefer the other approach, to keep the > two series separate (second immediately after the first, or not, doesn't > matter), rather than combined into one bit_spin_lock-less series. > Please clarify! Thanks, Yes, two separate series. Apologies for the confuddling.
