On Fri, 18 Nov 2022 12:51:09 -0800 (PST) Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > But the first series has not yet graduated from mm-unstable, > so if Andrew and/or Kirill also prefer to have them combined into one > bit_spin_lock-less series, that I can do. (And the end result should be > identical, so would not complicate Johannes's lock_page_memcg() excision.) I'd prefer that approach. It's -rc5 and the earlier "mm,huge,rmap: unify and speed up compound mapcounts" series has had some testing. I'd prefer not to toss it all out and start again.
