Re: Patch workqueue: create new slab cache instead of hacking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 10:03 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> 
> > Creating a dedicated cache for few objects ? Thats a lot of overhead, at
> > least for SLAB (no merges of caches)
> 
> Its some overhead for SLAB (a lot is what? If you tune down the per cpu
> caches it should be a couple of pages) but its none for SLUB.

SLAB overhead per cache is O(CPUS * nr_node_ids)  (unless alien caches
are disabled)

For few in flight objects, its just better to use standard kmalloc-xxxx
caches.



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]