On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 05:47:21PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 06:03:00PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > Oh, nice! I will fix this for v2. > > list_count() is an antipattern. I don't have any of the patches in > my inbox, so maybe there's a great reason for doing this, but my > immediate response is: NAK. When we are trying to hide iterator variable in many cases, leaving the current code alive will allow explicit access to it. If it's not a problem, why to bother with the other list APIs then? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
