Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > kvzalloc(GFP_ATOMIC) was perfectly fine, is this illegal again?
>
> kvmalloc has never really supported GFP_ATOMIC semantic.
It did, you added it:
ce91f6ee5b3b ("mm: kvmalloc does not fallback to vmalloc for incompatible gfp flags")
