On Mon, 5 Mar 2012 14:59:53 -0500 Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 03:09:29PM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:53:32 -0800 (PST) > > > Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > Subject: Re: exit_mmap() BUG_ON triggering since 3.1 > > > > ... > > > > Subject: [PATCH] mm: thp: fix BUG on mm->nr_ptes > > > > > > So it's needed in 3.1.x and 3.2.x? > > > > Indeed it would be needed in -stable, thanks, I forgot to add that. > > > > And although Fedora only got reports from 3.1 onwards, I believe it > > would equally be needed in 3.0.x. 3.1.x is closed down now, but > > 3.0.x and 3.2.x are still open. > > > > I've not yet tried applying it to the latest of either of those: maybe > > it applies cleanly and correctly, but I could imagine movements too. > > But the first step, yes, is to Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > I don't see this in linux-next, 3.3-rcX, the stable-queue, or really > anywhere at all at the moment. Did the patch get swallowed up by some > kind of evil code Eagle of Doom before making it into the safety of a > tree somewhere? I have it queued for 3.3. It's taking a while to get things into -next at present because they're breaking things faster than I can fix them :( -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>