On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 10:28:30AM +0100, John Garry wrote: > On 18/08/2022 03:06, Oliver Sang wrote: > > Hi Oliver, > > > > > did I do the right thing? > > > Sorry but I was not really interested in 4cbfca5f77 and I see where that > > > build error is coming, but don't be concerned with it. However, for > > > avoidance of doubt, if you have results for vanilla v6.0-rc1 then that would > > > be appreciated. > > for v6.0-rc1, it's still 512/512 > > > > > I will also send a separate patch for testing if you don't mind. > > sure! we are very glad that we could help. > > As you probably saw, I sent "[RFT PATCH] ata: libata: Set __ATA_BASE_SHT > max_sectors" for testing on top of v6.0-rc1, and I hope that then we can get > same performance as v5.19 yeah, our test confirmed your expectation: stress-ng.copy-file.ops_per_sec v5.19 - 26.85 v6.0-rc1 - 23.03 v6.0-rc1 + your patch - 26.94 > > Thanks, > John
