> -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2022 13:43 > To: Wang, Haiyue <haiyue.wang@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; david@xxxxxxxxxx; apopple@xxxxxxxxxx; > linmiaohe@xxxxxxxxxx; Huang, Ying <ying.huang@xxxxxxxxx>; songmuchun@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; > naoya.horiguchi@xxxxxxxxx; alex.sierra@xxxxxxx; Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Vasily Gorbik > <gor@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Christian Borntraeger > <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Sven Schnelle <svens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mike Kravetz > <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] mm: migration: fix the FOLL_GET failure on following huge page > > On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 03:31:37 +0000 "Wang, Haiyue" <haiyue.wang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > } > > > > > > I would be better to fix this for real at those three client code sites? > > > > Then 5.19 will break for a while to wait for the final BIG patch ? > > If that's the proposal then your [1/2] should have had a cc:stable and > changelog words describing the plan for 6.0. > > But before we do that I'd like to see at least a prototype of the final > fixes to s390 and hugetlb, so we can assess those as preferable for Got it, make sense. ;-) > backporting. I don't think they'll be terribly intrusive or risky?
